Funding Models

Prop Firms With a 90%+ Profit Split

33 firms match this criteria

Profit split is the single most-advertised and least-consistently-stated number in the prop industry. A firm can headline “up to 100%” while paying 70% until you hit a scaling milestone that most traders never reach.

This page ranks on the split you start on, taken from each firm's verified programs and account tiers — the same definition the directory's profit-split sort uses. Where a split scales, the ceiling is shown as context next to the starting number.

Split alone doesn't decide a firm. A 90% split on a program with an aggressive trailing drawdown and a slow first payout can be worth less than 80% somewhere stable — cross-check against drawdown type and payout terms before you buy.

How a firm qualifies

A firm qualifies when its starting profit split — the split paid on day one, taken from its verified programs and tiers — is 90% or higher. Firms advertising “up to 100%” but starting lower do not qualify. Firms with no stated split are excluded rather than treated as 0%.

Results use ProprietaryTrading.com's program and account-tier data where available, with firm-level data used as a fallback when appropriate. Firms with no stated value are excluded rather than counted as zero.

Full methodology →

Industry statistics

What this group looks like

Auto-computed from proprietarytrading.com's firm database

Offer instant funding: 6%
Allow copy trading: 18%
Accept US traders: 88%
Typical profit split: 90%
Most common platforms: Rithmic · NinjaTrader · MetaTrader 5

Firm	Model	Profit split	Max allocation	Starting split
Apex Trader Funding Austin, USA 4.3(19,436)	Evaluation Based	100%	$300,000	100% starting split on Intraday Trail	View →Compare
Atlas Funded London 2.9(851)	Evaluation Based	90%	$400,000	100% starting split on Instant Funding	View →Compare
Bright Trading Las Vegas, USA 3.5(1)	Leveraged Trader Capital	100%	—	100% starting split	View →Compare
TopOne Trader Hong Kong 4.5(3,189)	Evaluation Based	80%	$200,000	100% starting split on Nova Challenge	View →Compare
Avatar Securities New York, NY No trader reviews yet	Leveraged Trader Capital	95%	—	95% starting split	View →Compare
E8 Markets Dallas, USA 4.3(3,275)	Instant Funding	95%	$400,000	95% starting split	View →Compare
FundedNext Dubai, UAE 4.5(69,683)	Evaluation Based	95%	$400,000	95% starting split on Stellar 2-Step	View →Compare
FundingPips Dubai, UAE 4.5(57,200)	Evaluation Based	100%	$200,000	95% starting split on 2 Step	View →Compare
Great Point Capital Chicago, USA 3.8(9)	Leveraged Trader Capital	95%	—	95% starting split	View →Compare
T3 Trading Group New York, USA 3.3(2)	Leveraged Trader Capital	95%	$20,000,000	95% starting split	View →Compare
The Funded Trader Florida, USA 2.9(22,014)	Evaluation Based	90%	$600,000	95% starting split on Royal Pro Challenge	View →Compare
Alpha Capital Group London, UK 4.7(19,784)	Evaluation Based	90%	$200,000	90% starting split on Alpha Direct	View →Compare
Aqua Funded Dubai, UAE 3.0(1,413)	Evaluation Based	95%	—	90% starting split on Instant Funding (scales to 100%)	View →Compare
Blue Guardian Toronto, Canada 3.5(2,183)	Evaluation Based	85%	—	90% starting split on 1-Step	View →Compare
Blueberry Funded Sydney 3.0(1,527)	Evaluation Based	90%	$600,000	90% starting split	View →Compare
BluSky Trading Co Denver, CO 4.7(832)	Evaluation Based	90%	$500,000	90% starting split on LAUNCH	View →Compare
BrightFunded Amsterdam, Netherlands 4.0(545)	Evaluation Based	90%	$200,000	90% starting split on 2-Step Classic (scales to 100%)	View →Compare
Bulenox Dallas, USA 4.7(1,631)	Evaluation Based	90%	$250,000	90% starting split on Qualification Account - Opt 1: No Scaling Account (scales to 100%)	View →Compare
Elite Trader Funding Las Vegas, USA 3.8(1,084)	Evaluation Based	80%	$300,000	90% starting split on 1 Step (scales to 100%)	View →Compare
Funding Traders Dubai 3.5(3,302)	Evaluation Based	90%	$2,000,000	90% starting split on Instant Funded (scales to 100%)	View →Compare
Integra Trade New York, USA 3.6(2)	Leveraged Trader Capital	90%	$20,000,000	90% starting split	View →Compare
Leeloo Trading Chicago, USA 3.2(609)	Evaluation Based	100%	—	90% starting split on Leeloo Bundle (LB) Accounts (scales to 100%)	View →Compare
Lucid Trading Dallas, TX, USA 4.7(4,028)	Evaluation Based	80%	$150,000	90% starting split on LucidPro	View →Compare
My Funded Futures Charlotte, USA 4.9(18,730)	Evaluation Based	90%	$150,000	90% starting split on Rapid	View →Compare
OANDA Prop Trader London 3.7(1,216)	Evaluation Based	90%	$400,000	90% starting split	View →Compare
OneUp Trader Las Vegas, USA 4.7(2,532)	Evaluation Based	90%	$250,000	90% starting split on 1-Step Evaluation	View →Compare
SevenPoints Capital New York, NY No trader reviews yet	Leveraged Trader Capital	90%	—	90% starting split	View →Compare
Take Profit Trader Phoenix, USA 4.4(9,525)	Evaluation Based	90%	$150,000	90% starting split on PRO+	View →Compare
ThinkCapital Cyprus 4.0(607)	Evaluation Based	90%	—	90% starting split on Dual Step	View →Compare
Topstep Chicago, USA 3.5(14,130)	Evaluation Based	90%	$150,000	90% starting split on Trading Combine	View →Compare
Topstep Stocks (Topstep Equities) Chicago, IL 3.5(14,130)	Evaluation Based	90%	$300,000	90% starting split on Trading Combine	View →Compare
TradeDay London/Chicago 4.6(1,348)	Evaluation Based	90%	$150,000	90% starting split on Quick Pay (Intraday Drawdown)	View →Compare
Uprofit Tampa, USA 3.5(6,541)	Evaluation Based	80%	—	90% starting split on Day Soft	View →Compare

Related lists

Explore related criteria

Disclosure

ProprietaryTrading.com may receive compensation from certain companies featured on this site. These relationships never influence ratings, rankings, match results, verification status, or directory inclusion. Learn more in our Methodology & Editorial Standards.