Head-to-head
Blue Guardian vs FTMO
A direct, side-by-side comparison of Blue Guardian and FTMO — profit splits, evaluation fees, payout cadence, supported assets, and trading rules. Data pulled live from our firm directory.
Quick verdict
Blue Guardian is best for
traders who prefer Evaluation-Based Funding and a Toronto, Canada-based firm.
Full Blue Guardian profile →Quick verdict
FTMO is best for
traders prioritizing profit share (90% vs 85%); copy-trading setups.
Full FTMO profile →Cost to first payout
Cost to first payout
What it actually costs to reach payout — a normalized estimate built from each firm's lowest published evaluation cost, monthly fees, and first-payout window. Estimates, not guarantees. Each card shows the assumptions used.
Blue Guardian
Not enough structured fee data published to estimate a cost-to-first-payout figure for this firm.
FTMO
estimateApprox. total
—
to reach first payout eligibility
Approx. time
17days
from sign-up to first eligible request
- Start cost
- —
- Monthly fee
- None
How we estimated this
- Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
- Source — eval fee: €89–€1,080 one-time (refundable on pass); monthly: No monthly fee — one-time challenge cost; first payout: First payout possible after 14 days; reduce to weekly on request.
Trade-offs
Where each firm is weaker
No firm wins on every axis. These are the most meaningful drawbacks of each option — derived from the same structured fields shown in the table, never invented.
Blue Guardian trade-offs
Lower profit split
Pays 85% versus 90% — 5 points less of every funded dollar.
No copy trading
Forbids copy / algo bridges. FTMO permits them.
FTMO trade-offs
No structural disadvantages versus the other firm based on the fields we track.
Decision guide
Best for your trader type
| Attribute | Blue Guardian Evaluation Based · est. 2021 | FTMO Evaluation Based · est. 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Evaluation fee | — | €89–€1,080 one-time (refundable on pass) |
| Monthly fee | — | No monthly fee — one-time challenge cost |
| Evaluation required | Yes | Yes |
| Instant funding | No | No |
| Capital | ||
| Profit split | 85% | 90% |
| Max allocation | $10K–$200K | $200,000 |
| Account sizes | $10K–$200K | $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K (USD/EUR/GBP/CZK) |
| Scaling | — | Scaling Plan: +25% balance every 4 months at 10%+ profit over 2 of 4 months. |
| Payouts | ||
| Frequency | Biweekly | On-demand (default 14 days, weekly available) |
| First payout | Instant | First payout possible after 14 days; reduce to weekly on request |
| Assets | ||
| Futures | No | Yes |
| Stocks | No | Yes |
| Options | No | No |
| Forex | Yes | Yes |
| Crypto | Yes | Yes |
| Trading rules | ||
| News trading | Yes | Yes |
| Overnight holding | Yes | Yes |
| Weekend holding | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | No | Yes |
| Technology | ||
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, DXtrade |
| Data feed | — | Purple Trading / Spotware |
| Company | ||
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Prague, Czech Republic |
About Blue Guardian
Canadian evaluation prop firm with rapid, elite and accelerated challenge paths across CFD markets.
Full Blue Guardian profile →Trust & stability
Reputation and rule-change activity
Two added decision signals: a weighted reputation score from independent review sources, and a 90-day view of structural rule-change activity where monitored sources are available.
Reputation
canonical- Sources used
- 1
- Confidence
- medium
Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.
Rule Stability
last 90d- Last change
- —
- Type
- —
- Sources monitored
- —
- Status
- No changes detected in monitored sources
Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.
Reputation
canonical- Sources used
- 1
- Confidence
- medium
Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.
Rule Stability
last 90d- Last change
- —
- Type
- —
- Sources monitored
- —
- Status
- No changes detected in monitored sources
Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.
Frequently asked
Common questions
- Which has a higher profit split — Blue Guardian or FTMO?
- Blue Guardian pays 85%; FTMO pays 90% of trader profits once funded. FTMO pays a higher share to the trader.
- Is Blue Guardian cheaper to start than FTMO?
- Blue Guardian: evaluation pricing varies. FTMO: evaluation from €89–€1,080 one-time (refundable on pass).
- Which pays out faster — Blue Guardian or FTMO?
- Blue Guardian payouts: Biweekly. FTMO payouts: On-demand (default 14 days, weekly available). First-payout eligibility: Blue Guardian — Instant; FTMO — First payout possible after 14 days; reduce to weekly on request.
- What's the maximum allocation at Blue Guardian vs FTMO?
- Blue Guardian scales up to $10K–$200K. FTMO scales up to $200,000.
- Can I trade news at Blue Guardian or FTMO?
- Blue Guardian: permits news trading. FTMO: permits news trading.
- Can I hold positions overnight at Blue Guardian or FTMO?
- Blue Guardian: allows overnight holds. FTMO: allows overnight holds.
Still deciding?
Get a personalized firm match
A short quiz about your trading style, account size, and goals — we'll rank Blue Guardian, FTMO, and every other firm in our database by fit.
Find my firm match →