Head-to-head
Lark Funding vs ProFunder
A direct, side-by-side comparison of Lark Funding and ProFunder — profit splits, evaluation fees, payout cadence, supported assets, and trading rules. Data pulled live from our firm directory.
Quick verdict
Lark Funding is best for
traders who prefer Evaluation-Based Funding and a Riga, Latvia-based firm.
Full Lark Funding profile →Quick verdict
ProFunder is best for
traders who prefer Evaluation-Based Funding and a Toronto, Canada-based firm.
Full ProFunder profile →Cost to first payout
Cost to first payout
What it actually costs to reach payout — a normalized estimate built from each firm's lowest published evaluation cost, monthly fees, and first-payout window. Estimates, not guarantees. Each card shows the assumptions used.
Lark Funding is roughly $50 cheaper to reach a first payout than ProFunder, based on published fees alone.
Lark Funding
estimateApprox. total
$49
to reach first payout eligibility
Approx. time
24days
from sign-up to first eligible request
- Start cost
- $49
- Monthly fee
- —
How we estimated this
- Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
- Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
- Source — eval fee: $49; monthly: —; first payout: After 14 days.
ProFunder
estimateApprox. total
$99
to reach first payout eligibility
Approx. time
24days
from sign-up to first eligible request
- Start cost
- $99
- Monthly fee
- —
How we estimated this
- Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
- Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
- Source — eval fee: $99; monthly: —; first payout: After 14 days.
Decision guide
Best for your trader type
- Highest profit share
Tie
Both pay 80%.
| Attribute | Lark Funding Evaluation-Based Funding · est. 2023 | ProFunder Evaluation-Based Funding · est. 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Evaluation fee | $49 | $99 |
| Monthly fee | — | — |
| Evaluation required | Yes | Yes |
| Instant funding | No | No |
| Capital | ||
| Profit split | 80% | 80% |
| Max allocation | $200,000 | $200,000 |
| Account sizes | $10K–$200K | $10K–$200K |
| Scaling | — | — |
| Payouts | ||
| Frequency | Bi-Weekly | Bi-Weekly |
| First payout | After 14 days | After 14 days |
| Assets | ||
| Futures | No | No |
| Stocks | No | No |
| Options | No | No |
| Forex | Yes | Yes |
| Crypto | Yes | Yes |
| Trading rules | ||
| News trading | — | — |
| Overnight holding | Yes | Yes |
| Weekend holding | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Yes | Yes |
| Technology | ||
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 5, cTrader |
| Data feed | — | — |
| Company | ||
| Headquarters | Riga, Latvia | Toronto, Canada |
About ProFunder
Multi-asset prop firm offering forex, indices, commodities and crypto evaluations.
Full ProFunder profile →Trust & stability
Reputation and rule-change activity
Two added decision signals: a weighted reputation score from independent review sources, and a 90-day view of structural rule-change activity where monitored sources are available.
Reputation
canonical- Sources used
- 1
- Confidence
- medium
Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.
Rule Stability
last 90d- Last change
- —
- Type
- —
- Sources monitored
- —
- Status
- No changes detected in monitored sources
Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.
Reputation
Not enough independent rating sources to compute a canonical score yet.
Rule Stability
last 90d- Last change
- —
- Type
- —
- Sources monitored
- —
- Status
- No changes detected in monitored sources
Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.
Frequently asked
Common questions
- Which has a higher profit split — Lark Funding or ProFunder?
- Lark Funding pays 80%; ProFunder pays 80% of trader profits once funded. Both firms offer the same profit share.
- Is Lark Funding cheaper to start than ProFunder?
- Lark Funding: evaluation from $49. ProFunder: evaluation from $99.
- Which pays out faster — Lark Funding or ProFunder?
- Lark Funding payouts: Bi-Weekly. ProFunder payouts: Bi-Weekly. First-payout eligibility: Lark Funding — After 14 days; ProFunder — After 14 days.
- What's the maximum allocation at Lark Funding vs ProFunder?
- Lark Funding scales up to $200,000. ProFunder scales up to $200,000.
- Can I hold positions overnight at Lark Funding or ProFunder?
- Lark Funding: allows overnight holds. ProFunder: allows overnight holds.
Still deciding?
Get a personalized firm match
A short quiz about your trading style, account size, and goals — we'll rank Lark Funding, ProFunder, and every other firm in our database by fit.
Find my firm match →