Head-to-head

For Traders vs FXFunded

A direct, side-by-side comparison of For Traders and FXFunded — profit splits, evaluation fees, payout cadence, supported assets, and trading rules. Data pulled live from our firm directory.

Quick verdict

For Traders is best for

copy-trading setups.

Full For Traders profile →

Quick verdict

FXFunded is best for

scaling toward larger allocations (up to $400,000); news traders.

Full FXFunded profile →

Cost to first payout

Cost to first payout

What it actually costs to reach payout — a normalized estimate built from each firm's lowest published evaluation cost, monthly fees, and first-payout window. Estimates, not guarantees. Each card shows the assumptions used.

For Traders is roughly $20 cheaper to reach a first payout than FXFunded, based on published fees alone.

For Traders

estimate

Approx. total

$49

to reach first payout eligibility

Approx. time

24days

from sign-up to first eligible request

Start cost
$49
Monthly fee
How we estimated this
  • Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
  • Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
  • Source — eval fee: $49; monthly: ; first payout: After 14 days.

FXFunded

estimate

Approx. total

$69

to reach first payout eligibility

Approx. time

24days

from sign-up to first eligible request

Start cost
$69
Monthly fee
How we estimated this
  • Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
  • Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
  • Source — eval fee: From $69; monthly: ; first payout: Bi-weekly.

Trade-offs

Where each firm is weaker

No firm wins on every axis. These are the most meaningful drawbacks of each option — derived from the same structured fields shown in the table, never invented.

For Traders trade-offs

  • Lower scaling ceiling

    Scales to $300,000 vs $400,000 at FXFunded — caps long-term capital growth.

FXFunded trade-offs

  • No copy trading

    Forbids copy / algo bridges. For Traders permits them.

Decision guide

Best for your trader type

  • Highest profit share

    Tie

    Both pay 90%.

  • Biggest scaling ceiling

    FXFunded

    Up to $400,000.

  • News traders

    FXFunded

    Allows trading through news events.

  • Copy & algo traders

    For Traders

    Copy trading is permitted.

AttributeFor Traders

Evaluation Based · est. 2023

FXFunded

Evaluation Based · est. 2022

Cost
Evaluation fee$49From $69
Monthly fee
Evaluation requiredYesYes
Instant fundingNoNo
Capital
Profit split90%90%
Max allocation$300,000$400,000
Account sizes$5K–$200KUSD 10k – 200k
ScalingPick the size that fits — and scale as you prove yourself.
Payouts
FrequencyBi-WeeklyBi-weekly
First payoutAfter 14 daysBi-weekly
Assets
FuturesNoNo
StocksNoNo
OptionsNoNo
ForexYesYes
CryptoYesYes
Trading rules
News tradingYes
Overnight holdingYesYes
Weekend holdingYesYes
Copy tradingYesNo
Technology
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5
Data feed
Company
HeadquartersTallinn, EstoniaDubai

About For Traders

Forex prop firm with transparent rule set and configurable challenge models.

Full For Traders profile →

About FXFunded

Evaluation prop firm offering multi-step funding programs and scaling plans across forex and CFDs.

Full FXFunded profile →

Trust & stability

Reputation and rule-change activity

Two added decision signals: a weighted reputation score from independent review sources, and a 90-day view of structural rule-change activity where monitored sources are available.

Reputation

canonical
4.0/ 5
Sources used
1
Confidence
medium

Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.

Rule Stability

last 90d
monitoring status
Last change
Type
Sources monitored
Status
No changes detected in monitored sources

Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.

Reputation

canonical
2.9/ 5
Sources used
1
Confidence
low

Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.

Rule Stability

last 90d
monitoring status
Last change
Type
Sources monitored
Status
No changes detected in monitored sources

Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.

Frequently asked

Common questions

Which has a higher profit split — For Traders or FXFunded?
For Traders pays 90%; FXFunded pays 90% of trader profits once funded. Both firms offer the same profit share.
Is For Traders cheaper to start than FXFunded?
For Traders: evaluation from $49. FXFunded: evaluation from From $69.
Which pays out faster — For Traders or FXFunded?
For Traders payouts: Bi-Weekly. FXFunded payouts: Bi-weekly. First-payout eligibility: For Traders — After 14 days; FXFunded — Bi-weekly.
What's the maximum allocation at For Traders vs FXFunded?
For Traders scales up to $300,000. FXFunded scales up to $400,000.
Can I trade news at For Traders or FXFunded?
For Traders: policy unconfirmed. FXFunded: permits news trading.
Can I hold positions overnight at For Traders or FXFunded?
For Traders: allows overnight holds. FXFunded: allows overnight holds.

Still deciding?

Get a personalized firm match

Answer a few questions about your trading style, account size, and goals. In about 1 minute, we'll rank For Traders, FXFunded, and every other firm in our database by fit.

Find my firm match →

Disclosure

ProprietaryTrading.com may receive compensation from certain companies featured on this site. These relationships never influence ratings, rankings, match results, verification status, or directory inclusion. Learn more in our Methodology & Editorial Standards.