Head-to-head
For Traders vs FXFunded
A direct, side-by-side comparison of For Traders and FXFunded — profit splits, evaluation fees, payout cadence, supported assets, and trading rules. Data pulled live from our firm directory.
Quick verdict
FXFunded is best for
scaling toward larger allocations (up to $400,000); news traders.
Full FXFunded profile →Cost to first payout
Cost to first payout
What it actually costs to reach payout — a normalized estimate built from each firm's lowest published evaluation cost, monthly fees, and first-payout window. Estimates, not guarantees. Each card shows the assumptions used.
For Traders is roughly $20 cheaper to reach a first payout than FXFunded, based on published fees alone.
For Traders
estimateApprox. total
$49
to reach first payout eligibility
Approx. time
24days
from sign-up to first eligible request
- Start cost
- $49
- Monthly fee
- —
How we estimated this
- Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
- Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
- Source — eval fee: $49; monthly: —; first payout: After 14 days.
FXFunded
estimateApprox. total
$69
to reach first payout eligibility
Approx. time
24days
from sign-up to first eligible request
- Start cost
- $69
- Monthly fee
- —
How we estimated this
- Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
- Adds ~10 calendar days for evaluation completion (most firms require ≥5 minimum trading days).
- Source — eval fee: From $69; monthly: —; first payout: Bi-weekly.
Trade-offs
Where each firm is weaker
No firm wins on every axis. These are the most meaningful drawbacks of each option — derived from the same structured fields shown in the table, never invented.
For Traders trade-offs
Lower scaling ceiling
Scales to $300,000 vs $400,000 at FXFunded — caps long-term capital growth.
FXFunded trade-offs
No copy trading
Forbids copy / algo bridges. For Traders permits them.
Decision guide
Best for your trader type
- Highest profit share
Tie
Both pay 90%.
- Biggest scaling ceiling
Up to $400,000.
- News traders
Allows trading through news events.
- Copy & algo traders
Copy trading is permitted.
| Attribute | For Traders Evaluation Based · est. 2023 | FXFunded Evaluation Based · est. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Evaluation fee | $49 | From $69 |
| Monthly fee | — | — |
| Evaluation required | Yes | Yes |
| Instant funding | No | No |
| Capital | ||
| Profit split | 90% | 90% |
| Max allocation | $300,000 | $400,000 |
| Account sizes | $5K–$200K | USD 10k – 200k |
| Scaling | Pick the size that fits — and scale as you prove yourself. | — |
| Payouts | ||
| Frequency | Bi-Weekly | Bi-weekly |
| First payout | After 14 days | Bi-weekly |
| Assets | ||
| Futures | No | No |
| Stocks | No | No |
| Options | No | No |
| Forex | Yes | Yes |
| Crypto | Yes | Yes |
| Trading rules | ||
| News trading | — | Yes |
| Overnight holding | Yes | Yes |
| Weekend holding | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Yes | No |
| Technology | ||
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 |
| Data feed | — | — |
| Company | ||
| Headquarters | Tallinn, Estonia | Dubai |
About For Traders
Forex prop firm with transparent rule set and configurable challenge models.
Full For Traders profile →About FXFunded
Evaluation prop firm offering multi-step funding programs and scaling plans across forex and CFDs.
Full FXFunded profile →Trust & stability
Reputation and rule-change activity
Two added decision signals: a weighted reputation score from independent review sources, and a 90-day view of structural rule-change activity where monitored sources are available.
Reputation
canonical- Sources used
- 1
- Confidence
- medium
Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.
Rule Stability
last 90d- Last change
- —
- Type
- —
- Sources monitored
- —
- Status
- No changes detected in monitored sources
Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.
Reputation
canonical- Sources used
- 1
- Confidence
- low
Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.
Rule Stability
last 90d- Last change
- —
- Type
- —
- Sources monitored
- —
- Status
- No changes detected in monitored sources
Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.
Frequently asked
Common questions
- Which has a higher profit split — For Traders or FXFunded?
- For Traders pays 90%; FXFunded pays 90% of trader profits once funded. Both firms offer the same profit share.
- Is For Traders cheaper to start than FXFunded?
- For Traders: evaluation from $49. FXFunded: evaluation from From $69.
- Which pays out faster — For Traders or FXFunded?
- For Traders payouts: Bi-Weekly. FXFunded payouts: Bi-weekly. First-payout eligibility: For Traders — After 14 days; FXFunded — Bi-weekly.
- What's the maximum allocation at For Traders vs FXFunded?
- For Traders scales up to $300,000. FXFunded scales up to $400,000.
- Can I trade news at For Traders or FXFunded?
- For Traders: policy unconfirmed. FXFunded: permits news trading.
- Can I hold positions overnight at For Traders or FXFunded?
- For Traders: allows overnight holds. FXFunded: allows overnight holds.
Still deciding?
Get a personalized firm match
Answer a few questions about your trading style, account size, and goals. In about 1 minute, we'll rank For Traders, FXFunded, and every other firm in our database by fit.
Find my firm match →Disclosure
ProprietaryTrading.com may receive compensation from certain companies featured on this site. These relationships never influence ratings, rankings, match results, verification status, or directory inclusion. Learn more in our Methodology & Editorial Standards.