Head-to-head

Audacity Capital vs The Trading Pit

A direct, side-by-side comparison of Audacity Capital and The Trading Pit — profit splits, evaluation fees, payout cadence, supported assets, and trading rules. Data pulled live from our firm directory.

Quick verdict

Audacity Capital is best for

traders avoiding evaluation hurdles.

Full Audacity Capital profile →

Quick verdict

The Trading Pit is best for

traders prioritizing profit share (80% vs 50%).

Full The Trading Pit profile →

Watch flags · risk only

Public risk notes we've recorded on the firm record. Not a judgement of fit — just things to verify before committing capital.

  • Audacity Capital

    unregulated industry status, reports of denied or delayed trader payouts

Cost to first payout

Cost to first payout

What it actually costs to reach payout — a normalized estimate built from each firm's lowest published evaluation cost, monthly fees, and first-payout window. Estimates, not guarantees. Each card shows the assumptions used.

Audacity Capital

estimate

Approx. total

$37

to reach first payout eligibility

Approx. time

—

from sign-up to first eligible request

Start cost
$37
Monthly fee
—
How we estimated this
  • Evaluation path: lowest published one-time evaluation fee.
  • Source — eval fee: $49 to $1,049 (discounted to $37 to $787 depending on account size); monthly: —; first payout: Same day upon approval.

The Trading Pit

Not enough structured fee data published to estimate a cost-to-first-payout figure for this firm.

Trade-offs

Where each firm is weaker

No firm wins on every axis. These are the most meaningful drawbacks of each option — derived from the same structured fields shown in the table, never invented.

Audacity Capital trade-offs

  • Lower profit split

    Pays 50% versus 80% — 30 points less of every funded dollar.

  • Open risk note

    Watch flag on file: unregulated industry status, reports of denied or delayed trader payouts

The Trading Pit trade-offs

No structural disadvantages versus the other firm based on the fields we track.

Decision guide

Best for your trader type

AttributeAudacity Capital

Evaluation · est. 2012

The Trading Pit

Evaluation · est. 2022

Cost
Evaluation fee$49 to $1,049 (discounted to $37 to $787 depending on account size)—
Monthly fee——
Evaluation requiredNoYes
Instant fundingNoNo
Capital
Profit split50%80%
Max allocation£15K up to £480K€5K–€2M (scaling to €5M)
Account sizes£15K up to £480K€5K–€2M (scaling to €5M)
ScalingAccounts can be scaled up to $2,000,000 (or up to $768,000 with FTP).—
Payouts
FrequencyMonthlyMonthly
First payoutSame day upon approval—
Assets
FuturesNoYes
StocksNoNo
OptionsNoNo
ForexYesYes
CryptoNoYes
Trading rules
News tradingYesYes
Overnight holdingYesYes
Weekend holdingYesYes
Copy tradingNoNo
Technology
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTraderMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Tradovate, Rithmic
Data feed——
Company
HeadquartersLondon, UKVaduz, Liechtenstein

About Audacity Capital

UK forex prop firm offering direct funded accounts with no evaluation challenge.

Full Audacity Capital profile →

About The Trading Pit

European prop firm offering a path from evaluation to a regulated trader contract with The Trading Pit Group.

Full The Trading Pit profile →

Trust & stability

Reputation and rule-change activity

Two added decision signals: a weighted reputation score from independent review sources, and a 90-day view of structural rule-change activity where monitored sources are available.

Reputation

canonical
3.5/ 5
Sources used
1
Confidence
medium

Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.

Rule Stability

last 90d
—monitoring status
Last change
—
Type
—
Sources monitored
—
Status
No changes detected in monitored sources

Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.

Reputation

canonical
3.5/ 5
Sources used
1
Confidence
medium

Weighted blend of independent trader-review sources. See methodology.

Rule Stability

last 90d
—monitoring status
Last change
—
Type
—
Sources monitored
—
Status
No changes detected in monitored sources

Weekly diff of the firm's published rule pages (terms, rules, FAQ, legal). "No changes detected" only means none of the monitored monitored sources changed — other surfaces (Discord, email, dashboards) are not covered. "Limited" or "unavailable" means our monitor cannot reach enough sources to make an honest call.

Frequently asked

Common questions

Which has a higher profit split — Audacity Capital or The Trading Pit?
Audacity Capital pays 50%; The Trading Pit pays 80% of trader profits once funded. The Trading Pit pays a higher share to the trader.
Is Audacity Capital cheaper to start than The Trading Pit?
Audacity Capital: evaluation from $49 to $1,049 (discounted to $37 to $787 depending on account size). The Trading Pit: evaluation pricing varies.
Which pays out faster — Audacity Capital or The Trading Pit?
Audacity Capital payouts: Monthly. The Trading Pit payouts: Monthly. First-payout eligibility: Audacity Capital — Same day upon approval; The Trading Pit — n/a.
Can I trade news at Audacity Capital or The Trading Pit?
Audacity Capital: permits news trading. The Trading Pit: permits news trading.
Can I hold positions overnight at Audacity Capital or The Trading Pit?
Audacity Capital: allows overnight holds. The Trading Pit: allows overnight holds.

Still deciding?

Get a personalized firm match

Answer a few questions about your trading style, account size, and goals. In about 1 minute, we'll rank Audacity Capital, The Trading Pit, and every other firm in our database by fit.

Find my firm match →

Disclosure

ProprietaryTrading.com may receive compensation from certain companies featured on this site. These relationships never influence ratings, rankings, match results, verification status, or directory inclusion. Learn more in our Methodology & Editorial Standards.